Great Italian and French Composers — Story, Setting & Ideas

(0 User reviews)   347
In Category - Composers
Ferris, George T. (George Titus), 1840- Project Gutenberg 2006 Not confirmed
Musicians -- Italy; Musicians -- France Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 69,824
Reading time 304 min
Text sections 8

Great Italian and French Composers — Story, Setting & Ideas can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 69,824 words, 5 hr 4 min estimated reading time, and 8 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 25.7 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Musicians -- Italy,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Examines authorial choices in Ferris's biographical sketches of Italian and French composers, focusing on diction, voice, and structural patterns in the excerpts, including the Belgian school's influence and Cherubini's Vienna period.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.7/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

the musical drama of "Orfeo." The story was written in Latin, and sung in music principally choral, though a few solo phrases were given to the principal characters. It was performed at Rome with great magnificence, and Vasari tells us that Peruzzi, the decorator of the papal theatre, painted such scenery for it that even the great Titian was so struck with the _vraisemblance_ of the work that he was not satisfied until he had touched the canvas to be sure of its not being in relief. We may fancy indeed that the scenery was one great attraction of the representation. In spite of spasmodic encouragement by the more liberally minded pontiffs, the general weight of church influence was against the new musical tendency, and the most skilled composers were at first afraid to devote their talents to further its growth.

What musicians did not dare undertake out of dread of the thunderbolts of the church, a company of _literati_ at Florence commenced in 1580. The primary purpose was the revival of Greek art, including music. This association, in conjunction with the Medicean Academy, laid down the rule that distinct individuality of expression in music was to be sought for. As results, quickly came musical drama with recitative (modern form of the Greek chorus) and solo melody for characteristic parts of the legend or story. Out of this beginning swiftly grew the opera. Composers in the new form sprung up in various parts of Italy, though Naples, Venice, and Florence continued to be its centres.

Between 1637 and 1700, there were performed three hundred operas at Venice alone. An account of the performance of "Berenice," composed by Domenico Freschi, at Padua, in 1680, dwarfs all our present ideas of spectacular splendor. In this opera there were choruses of a hundred virgins and a hundred soldiers; a hundred horsemen in steel armor; a hundred performers on trumpets, cornets, sackbuts, drums, flutes, and other instruments, on horseback and on foot; two lions led by two Turks, and two elephants led by two Indians; Berenice's triumphal car drawn by four horses, and six other cars with spoils and prisoners, drawn by twelve horses. Among the scenes in the first act was a vast plain with two triumphal arches; another with pavilions and tents; a square prepared for the entrance of the triumphal procession, and a forest for the chase. In the second act there were the royal apartments of Berenice's temple of vengeance, a spacious court with view of the prison and a covered way with long lines of chariots. In the third act there were the royal dressing-room, the stables with a hundred live horses, porticoes adorned with tapestry, and a great palace in the perspective. In the course of the piece there were representations of the hunting of the boar, the stag, and the lions. The whole concluded with a huge globe descending from the skies, and dividing itself in lesser globes of fire on which stood allegorical figures of fame, honor, nobility, virtue, and glory. The theatriccal manager had princes and nobles for bankers and assistants, and they lavished their treasures of art and money to make such spectacles as the modern stagemen of London and Paris cannot approach.

In Evelyn's diary there is an entry describing opera at Venice in 1645. "This night, having with my lord Bruce taken our places before, we went to the opera, where comedies and other plays are represented in recitative musiq by the most excellent musicians, vocal and instrumental, with variety of scenes painted and contrived with no lesse art of perspective, and machines for flying in the aire, and other wonderful motions; taken together it is one of the most magnificent and expensive diversions the wit of man can invent. The history was Hercules in Lydia. The sceanes changed thirteen times. The famous voices, Anna Rencia, a Roman and reputed the best treble of women; but there was a Eunuch who in my opinion surpassed her; also a Génoise that in my judgment sung an incomparable base. They held us by the eyes and ears till two o'clock i' the morning." Again he writes of the carnival of 1640: "The comedians have liberty and the operas are open; witty pasquils are thrown about, and the mountebanks have their stages at every corner. The diversion which chiefly took me up was three noble operas, where were most excellent voices and music, the most celebrated of which was the famous and beautiful Anna Rencia, whom we invited to a fish dinner after four daies in Lent, when they had given over at the theatre." Old Evelyn then narrates how he and his noble friend took the lovely diner out on a junketing, and got shot at with blunderbusses from the gondola of an infuriated rival.

Ferris opens his sketch of Palestrina by foregrounding the Belgian school of music as a crucial influence on Italian composition, a choice that immediately signals his comparative method. He describes the Belgians as having placed counterpoint on a solid basis, enabling later composers to build beautiful tone fabrics. This metaphor of construction recurs throughout the excerpts, suggesting Ferris views musical history as an edifice erected by successive masters. His authorial voice is that of a synthesizer, compressing a vast field into sketches for the general public, as he states in his note.

Diction and the Language of Influence

Ferris's diction often elevates his subjects through terms like indomitable spirit, eager and passionate culture, and imperishable beauty. These phrases, drawn from the Palestrina section, reflect a Romantic-era reverence for artistic genius. He also uses concrete financial and institutional details—such as Paisiello's salary of 12,000 francs a year—to ground his narrative. This blend of lofty praise and specific fact characterizes his authorial approach: he aims to inspire admiration while providing verifiable context. The word patientia laboris (patience of work) is quoted from Erasmus, showing Ferris's willingness to incorporate scholarly references to bolster his claims about the Belgian character.

Voice and the Narrative of Rivalry

Ferris frequently dramatizes personal and professional conflicts, as seen in the Cherubini section. He describes how the invitation of Paisiello to Paris gave great umbrage to the Conservatory, and how musical circles were shaken by petty contentions. This language of agitation—fretted and irritated, deepest depression—paints Cherubini as a sensitive genius buffeted by circumstance. Ferris also highlights acts of generosity, such as Méhul declining a position in favor of Cherubini, which reinforces a moral framework where true artists support one another. The narrative voice is that of a storyteller who values both drama and ethical exempla.

Structure: Thematic Grouping and Comparative Portraits

Ferris organizes his volume by grouping composers into chapters that often contrast or compare figures, as in the chapter on Piccini, Paisiello, and Cimarosa. Within the Cherubini excerpt, he explicitly compares Cherubini's Faniska with Beethoven's Fidelio, noting a striking similarity of style and quoting Mendelssohn's observation that Cherubini's dramatic style was Beethoven's most cherished pattern. This comparative structure allows Ferris to position his subjects within a broader European context, linking Italian and French composers to German counterparts. He also uses temporal markers—the winter of 1805—to anchor events precisely.

Recurring Details: The Patronage and Politics of Music

Ferris repeatedly returns to the theme of patronage and political interference. Napoleon's ebullitions of wrath over Cherubini's musical opinions, and the emperor's offer of a directorship that Cherubini declined due to contract, illustrate how power dynamics shaped composers' careers. Similarly, the Belgian chapel-masters in Italian churches and the invitation of Paisiello to Paris show a transnational flow of influence. Ferris also notes financial pressures: Cherubini had a large family depending on him and small means. These recurring details ground the lofty narrative of genius in practical realities, giving the reader a sense of the material conditions under which these composers worked.

Ferris's authorial choices—his elevated diction, dramatized rivalries, comparative structure, and attention to patronage—reveal a writer who sees music history as a blend of artistic achievement and human struggle. Readers attentive to these patterns will find that the sketches reward close reading not only for biographical facts but for the cultural assumptions embedded in Ferris's prose. His work reflects a late-nineteenth-century desire to popularize music history while maintaining scholarly credibility.

I finished that book about the Italian and French composers last week, and it’s still sitting with me—how quietly Ferris lets you hear each composer’s own voice through his word choices. It reminded me of another volume on the shelf, Famous composers and their works, Vol. 1 — Reading Companion, which feels like an old friend returning to the same rooms of memory, unhurried and familiar.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

How did this book work for you?

Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

What is your current status with this title?

2

What was your overall reaction to the book?

3

Would you encourage someone else to read it?

4

What was the reading difficulty like?

Related eBooks