Music and Its Masters — Context and Discussion
Edition facts
Before opening Music and Its Masters — Context and Discussion, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 29,666 words, 2 hr 9 min estimated reading time, and 11 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 26.1 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Music,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
Boys were exhaustively educated, while girls were neglected. This was the one blot on the glory of those times, and we, besides deprecating the injustice it involved, must regret that these ancient art-workers denied themselves that highest earthly source of inspiration, intercourse with the delicate enthusiasm, the keen perceptions, and art instinct of educated and loved womanhood; for to what heights might their achievements have attained but for this misconception of woman's nature and capacities!
One would think that Sappho's lyrics, which induced Plato to call her the "Tenth Muse," would have suggested the existence, in woman's purer and more sensitive nature, of a subtle vein of beautiful intellectuality, but such was not the case. Judging from what we have seen of early Aryan family life, this unpractical and debasing idea of suppressing woman must have been imbibed with Egyptian learning.
Music was taught in the Greek schools, and youths were thus fitted to join in the sacred choruses, and to appreciate the significance of poetry. The immortal bards sang their creations, and they often remained unwritten for generations. The drama developed from songs and dances. Music was a prominent feature of their symposiums, the lyre being passed from guest to guest, each contributing of his best to the intellectual feast. Banquets were brought to a close by singing hymns. Music pervaded each function of Hellenic life.
Their choruses were unisons, and their instrumental accompaniments were either purely rhythmic (regardless of pitch) or they followed the voice, for the Greeks had no discoverable conception of harmony. In contemplating the marvellous erudition and the poetic sense of ancient Greece, and the important _rôle_ played by music in the period of her glory, I can but feel that the failure to chronicle her melodies is a misfortune. They may not have been rich in variety of tone succession or in rhythm, but they doubtless were vigorous, expressive, and logically rounded, and they therefore mark the brightest point reached in the first era.
Greece succeeded Egypt as the world's teacher, and her precepts gain significance as advancing culture enables us to better comprehend the fine adjustment of imagination to nature which they embody. Her sculpture, architecture, and literature are the highest models that we have, and those of our architects who appreciate the import of monumental buildings look to ancient Greece for appropriate inspiration.
Is it not reasonable and logical to assume that the spirit of Greece's unwritten musical forms has been preserved, passed from nation to nation, and from generation to generation, and that it underlies our present classical school? I say spirit in speaking of musical transmission, for music's resources and outward forms were, in the Homeric period, and still are, in course of development.
It would be a waste of space to discuss the musical doings of other European nations during this period. Those that did least to prepare the way have been most active since our art took shape. As great as Italy's services have been since the sixteenth century (A.D. ), she did little for music previous to that time. St. Ambrose, of Milan (384 A.D. ), and St. Gregory, of Rome (590 A.D. ), ordained rituals, prayers, music, etc., but there is no detailed record of their achievements, therefore no authentic Gregorian chants.
CHAPTER III BIBLICAL MENTION OF MUSIC
The Old Testament is a chronicle of the growth, movements, physical and mental habits, and religious status of the great Jewish race. Its religion with one Godhead, whose immediate presence was often felt, its music addressed to this presence, and its family, tribal, and racial organizations were all Jewish. The great moving lever of Jewish existence was a religion whose creed prohibited the making of "graven images," so painting and sculpture were not cultivated; it recognized the direct agency of supreme will in moulding daily events, and prescribed oft-repeated praise and prayer, and thus created the atmosphere of exalted devotional feeling which we find recorded in many of the books of the Bible, and which climaxed in David's Psalms.
The ancient Hebrews were in no measure a scientific people. Their one intellectual aspiration found vent in beautifying the worship of God. They were religious teachers, who have directly or indirectly shaped the creeds of the civilized world.
According to the conditions upon which I have thus far based my theories of musical evolution, early Jewish songs could not have been equal, in artistic merit, to the texts with which they were associated, for there was an utter lack, in this race, of such general culture and art sense as we found prevailing in ancient Egypt; but the Hebrews were a race apart, and their unique instincts may have made their music an exception to all rules.
Boise opens his survey by declaring that music's early history offers 'no pregnant data for the historian' until the invention of notation, a claim that sets the tone for a work more concerned with asserting a lineage of genius than with documenting social or technical developments. The book's structure—moving from 'The Nature and Origin of Music' through chapters on biblical references, notation, and culminating in Wagner—reveals a teleological argument that music's value increases as it approaches the modern German tradition.
The author's voice is authoritative and occasionally combative, as when he dismisses French composers as 'emotionally volatile' while praising Berlioz for resisting 'the pressure of this environment.' This editorial lens highlights how Boise's narrative pace accelerates when discussing his chosen 'high-priests,' slowing to a near halt for detailed analysis of Schumann's rhythms or Wagner's reforms, while earlier eras are dispatched in sweeping paragraphs.
The Rhetoric of Musical Evolution
Boise's narrative is driven by a metaphor of progress: music evolves from 'shadowy' origins through a series of 'eras,' each marked by a 'high-priest.' This hierarchical framing is most explicit in Chapter VI, which asks 'Who is to be our seventh high-priest?'—a question that assumes a linear, almost religious succession of genius. The author's language shifts between technical description (Schumann's 'broken rhythms and dissonant compounds') and sweeping judgment ('the most remarkable,' 'without a rival').
Notably, Boise's pace varies with his subject. Early chapters on ancient music and biblical references move quickly, covering centuries in a few pages. But when he reaches the 19th century, the prose slows to accommodate extended analyses of individual works, such as Schumann's quintet or piano concerto. This uneven pacing suggests that Boise's true interest lies not in comprehensive history but in establishing a canon of German masters, with Wagner as the culmination.
National Character and Musical Judgment
Boise frequently attributes musical traits to national character, a common trope in 19th-century music criticism. France, he writes, produced 'quick perceptions' and 'deft and dainty' art, but its people are 'emotionally volatile' and prefer music that 'does not require them to think earnestly.' In contrast, German composers like Schumann and Beethoven are treated as thinkers and philosophers. This national lens shapes the book's structure: after a general historical overview, Boise devotes separate sections to each nation's contributions, evaluating them against an implicit German standard.
The author's language becomes notably more engaged when discussing German figures. Schumann is described as 'the first composer to feel and apply the immense, expressive resources inherent in rhythm,' a claim that positions him as a pioneer. Meanwhile, French composers are dismissed as 'few who have attained to more than passing fame.' This bias is not merely aesthetic but structural: the book's argument for musical progress depends on the superiority of the German tradition.
Voice and Authority in the Preface
Boise's preface reveals his didactic intent: 'I have endeavored through showing the true nature of music, and the conditions that are essential to its growth in breadth and significance, to incite amateurs to a more respectful consideration of its claims.' The word 'incite' is telling—Boise sees himself as a reformer, correcting the public's insufficient reverence for music. His tone throughout is that of a lecturer who expects to be heeded, rarely qualifying his assertions.
This authoritative voice is reinforced by the book's physical presentation: the front matter includes a full-page advertisement for a companion volume by Philip H. Goepp, 'Symphonies and Their Meaning,' suggesting that Boise's work was part of a series aimed at the same educated audience. The preface's address to 'amateurs' implies a readership of non-specialists who need guidance, and Boise's confident judgments—such as calling Schumann's piano concerto 'without a rival'—serve to establish his credibility as a guide.
Readers approaching this book should be aware that Boise's history is not neutral but argumentative, shaped by a clear preference for German Romanticism and a belief in music's moral and intellectual seriousness. The excerpts suggest that the most rewarding sections are those on Schumann and Wagner, where the author's analytical focus sharpens. For a fuller understanding of the period's musical debates, one might compare Boise's judgments with those of his contemporaries, such as Eduard Hanslick or George Bernard Shaw.
I keep thinking about how Boise saw composers as high-priests, music as something almost sacred, yet his book feels so earnest and plain-spoken. It made me remember the gentler guidance in How to Listen to Music, 7th ed. Hints and Suggestions to Untaught Lovers of the Art — Context and Discussion, which spoke to me as a beginner, not a devotee. That old kindness stays with me.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
Your personal reading reflection
Build a private reading journal entry for this title.