Curiosities of Music: A Collection of Facts not generally known, regarding the Music of Ancient and Savage Nations — Background and Themes
Edition facts
Curiosities of Music: A Collection of Facts not generally known, regarding the Music of Ancient and Savage Nations — Background and Themes can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 89,879 words, 6 hr 31 min estimated reading time, and 14 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 25.4 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Music -- History and criticism,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION.
Music has been broadly defined by Fetis as “the art of moving the feelings by combinations of sounds;” taken in this broad sense it may be considered as coeval with the human race.
Vocal music, in a crude form, is as natural in man, to express feelings, as it is for a cat to purr or a lion to roar; as regards instrumental music, the primitive man might have found in every hollow tree a reverberating drum, and in every conchshell or horn of cattle, the natural beginnings of instrumental music; we shall find later that many nations ascribe the discovery of their music to the accidental appliance of some natural instrument; our surest guide in watching the rise of the art, should be the manner in which savage peoples, yet in a state of nature, produce music, and we shall find too, that even the lowest in the scale, even those beings who make the monkey tribe nearer and dearer to us, as possible relatives (the bushmen of Australia for example), have still a method of “moving the feelings by means of combinations of sounds.”
It is therefore, really in barbarous nations, that we may, reasoning by analogy, find in what state music existed when our own ancestors were in a state of nature; but in order to give a more chronological character to our sketches we will begin with the _Music and Musical Mythology of the Ancients_.
With this people, and the Egyptians we find proofs of the existence of a musical system at a time which far antedates the earliest reliable Scriptural records.
Among the Hindoos especially, as far back as history extends, music has been treated not only as a fine art, but philosophically and mathematically. According to the oldest Brahminical records, in their all-embracing “Temple of Science,” it belongs to the 2d chief division of Lesser Sciences, but its natural and philosophic elements, are, with a nice distinction, admitted into their holiest and oldest book, the _Veda_.[1] Of course it has a divine origin ascribed to it, in fact the entire realm of Indian music is one tale of Mythology.
According to Brahminical accounts, when Brahma had lain in the egg three thousand billion, four hundred million of years (3,000,400,000,000) he split it by the force of his thought and made Heaven and Earth from the two pieces; then Manu brought forth ten great forces, which made Gods, Goddesses, good and evil spirits and Gandharbas (Genii of music), and Apsarasas (Genii of Dance), and these became the musicians of the Gods, before man knew of the art. Then Sarisvati, Goddess of Speech and Oratory, consort of Brahma, at Brahma’s command brought the art to man and gave him also his finest musical instrument, the Vina, of which hereafter. Music then found a protector in the demi-god Nared, one of the chief Indian musical deities, while Maheda Chrishna helped it along by allowing five keys, or modes, to spring from his head (_a la_ Minerva) in the shape of Nymphs, and his wife Parbuti, added one more; then Brahma added thirty lesser keys, or modes, and all these modes were also Nymphs.
The Hindoo scale has seven chief tones and these tones are represented as so many heavenly sisters.
In the Indian legends, music is represented as of immense might. All men, all animals, all inanimate nature listened to the singing of Maheda and Parbuti with ecstasy.
Some modes were never to be sung by mortals, as they were so fiery that the singer would be consumed by them. In the time of Akber, it is related, that ruler commanded Naik Gobaul, a famous singer, to sing the Raagni[2] of Fire; the poor singer entreated in vain, to be allowed to sing a less dangerous strain; then he plunged up to his neck in the river Djumna, and began: he had not finished more than half of his lay when the water around him began to boil; he paused (at boiling point) but the relentless, or curious Akber, demanded the rest, and with the end of the song the singer burst into flames and was consumed. Another melody caused clouds to rise and rain to fall; a female singer is said once to have saved Bengal from famine and drought in this manner. Another lay caused the sun to disappear and night to come at midday, or another could change winter to spring or rain to sunshine. All these typify beautifully the might of music with this race. Of the four chief tone systems, two also have divine origin, from Iswara and from Hanuman (the Indian Pan), the others come from Bharata Muni who invented the drama with music and dance, and from Calinath.
When Chrishna was upon the earth as a shepherd, there were sixteen thousand pastoral Nymphs or Shepherdesses who fell in love with him.—They all tried to win his heart by music, and each one sang him a song, and each one sang in a _different key_, (let us hope not all at once). Thence sprang the sixteen thousand keys, which according to tradition once existed in India.
In order that the full extent of Hindoo Musical Mythology may be conceived, we will now sketch the tones which are employed.
We have stated that there are seven chief tones; these tones have short monosyllabic names; as we give to our notes the syllables, _do_, _re_, _mi_, etc., the Hindoos call their scale tones _sa_, _ri_, _ga_, _ma_, _pa_, _dha_, _ni_, _sa_, which are certainly as easy to vocalise upon as our _solfeggi_; in fact the language is very well adapted to music, as it has all the softness, elegance and clearness of the Italian. Von Dalberg says that Sanscrit unites the splendor of the Spanish, the strength of the German, and the singableness of the Italian.
With the resemblance of seven chief tones, however, the similarity ends, for while our scale has only half tones as smallest interval, the Hindoos have quarter tones, and not equally distributed either; thus:
whole small half whole whole small half tone whole tone tone tone whole tone Sa Ri Ga Ma Pa Dha Ni Sa ¼¼¼¼ ¼¼¼ ¼¼ ¼¼¼¼ ¼¼¼¼ ¼¼¼ ¼¼
In theory it will be seen that the octave is always a half tone flat, but practically they correct this by singing it on its proper pitch. On six of the above intervals they found their chief modes but they form various lesser modes on each interval, i. e., they could give ten different modes, or scales, starting from C alone.
These six chief styles, are, of course, six Genii, corresponding to the six Hindoo divisions of the year, these are each married to five Nymphs, the thirty lesser styles; each Genii has eight sons, who are each wedded, also to Nymphs, one apiece. There seem to be few celibates in Hindoo Mythology, therefore an exact census gives to this interesting family six fathers, thirty mothers, forty-eight sons, forty-eight daughters-in-law, or one hundred thirty-two in all, each of them being the God or Goddess of some particular key, and each of them, of course, having a distinctive name; we shall not give the various names, but to illustrate the relationship among them, the following will suffice; the four 1-4 tones beginning on the fifth tone of the scale, _Panchama_ (or _Pa_) are the Nymphs _Malina_, _Chapala_, _Lola_ and _Serveretna_, while the next full tone (_Dha_) is owned by Santa and her sisters; if _Dha_ should be flatted 1-4 tone which would give it the same pitch as the highest 1-4 tone of _Pa_, (called Serveretna), the poetical Hindoo would not say “_Dha_ is flat,” but “_Serveretna_ has been introduced to the family of _Santa_ and her sisters.”[3]
Although the musical art of the Hindoos had such an early existence, it seems not to have developed or receded much since ancient days; they possess airs to which the European ear instantly, and involuntarily attaches harmony, (auxiliary voices), and yet they have not the slightest craving for harmony. They are completely satisfied to express all emotion by melody, sometimes combined with the dance, and yet do not feel the monotony, which would be obviated by additional voices.
But it must be said that, so far as melody goes, they have great taste and discrimination; the music often approaches the European in form and rhythm, and the Hindoo seems to feel instinctively the importance of the tonic, and dominant, and often finishes the phrases of a melody with a half cadence.[4]
Of the Hindoo instruments the Vina takes the lead; as before mentioned, they ascribe to it a divine origin; it has four strings and is incorrectly defined as a lyre by many commentators, but it is rather a guitar than lyre, and is made of a large hollow bamboo pipe, about 3½ feet long, at each end of which are two large hollow gourds, to increase the resonance: it may be roughly compared to a drum major’s _baton_, with a ball at _both_ ends, while the strings extend along the stick; it has a finger-board like a guitar, and the frets are not fastened permanently on it, but stuck on by the performer with wax.
The tone is both full and delicate, sometimes metallic and clear and very pleasant. The music composed for it is usually brilliant and rapid, and the Hindoos seem to have their Liszts and Rubinsteins; in the last century Djivan Shah was known throughout all India as a _virtuoso_, on the Vina.
They ornament their Vinas sometimes very richly and there are paintings of their chief performers, sitting with magnificent Vinas leaning against their bodies, this being the attitude of the player. They also have possessed from time immemorial, a three-stringed violin, so that Raphael and Tintoretto may not have committed an anachronism in painting Apollo with a violin.[5]
A Guitar called Magoudi, finishes the list of characteristic stringed instruments.
The instruments of percussion and wind instruments are more numerous. They possess four kinds of drums, and their popular, secular dances are usually accompanied by the Vina, for the melody, and drums, bells and cymbals.
Flutes they have possessed from remotest antiquity, and a muffled drum called Tare for funeral occasions, and they also have a double flute with a single mouth piece. We will not dwell further upon their instruments; there is but one, the _Vina_, which is really fitted to produce beautiful music.
The Hindoos complain that their old music is deteriorating and such singers as Chanan or Dhilcook, two vocal celebrities of the last centuries, have passed away. When one inquires for the miracle-working Ragas, (improvised songs) in Bengal, the people say there are singers probably left in Cashmere who can give them; and should you inquire in Cashmere they would send you to Bengal for them, but in reality there seems to have been comparatively little change in the style of Hindoo music from its earliest days.
CHAPTER II. ANCIENT EGYPTIAN.
The ancient Egyptians ascribed the origin of music to opposite causes, some legends giving its invention to beneficent Deities, while other legends are interpreted to give its origin to Satan, the evil principle, or at least the principle of sensuality, as represented by the buck Mendes. Hermes (or Mercury) is accredited with first having observed the harmony of the spheres, and the lyre also is represented as being his invention, in the following legend:
A heavy inundation of the Nile had taken place, and when the waters receded, there was left upon the banks a tortoise, who went the way of all tortoises, and after a time was completely dried up by the sun; the tendons however, which were attached to the shell, remained, and became tightly drawn by the expansion of the shell. Hermes, wandering upon the bank, accidentally struck his foot against it; the tendons resounded, and Hermes thus found a natural lyre.
This legend is however found also in Hindoo and Greek Mythology, and may be one of those tales, springing from Arian root, which belong to almost every race. We also find an Egyptian Apollo and Muses in other musical legends, according to Diodorus Siculus.
“When Osiris was in Ethiopia,—the Egyptian God Osiris was a sort of blending of Bacchus and Apollo—he met a troupe of revelling satyrs, and being a lover of pleasure and taking delight in choruses of music, he admitted them to his already numerous train of musicians. In the midst of these satyrs were nine young maidens, skilled in music and divers sciences.”
The Egyptians also considered Horus, brother of Osiris, (equivalent to the Greek Apollo) as God of Harmony.
Thus three Gods have the honor of fostering Egyptian music, Osiris, Horus, and Hermes.
Hermes, or (by his Egyptian name) Thoth, was the especial God of many sciences, and is said to have written two books of song, or works relating to the song-art. According to Diodorus, the Lyre which he had invented had three strings, which represented the three seasons of Egypt; the deepest string was the wet season, the middle one the growing season, the highest the harvest season: the tones of Egyptian music seem to be taken from the seven heavenly planets, as known to the ancients, and from this circumstance Ambros hazards the conjecture that the diatonic scale was known to them.
Among the mythical musical personages of the earliest Egyptian music, may be mentioned Maneros, who was son of the first king of Egypt, who succeeded the second dynasty of demi-gods.
He seems to be analogous to the Linus, (son of Apollo), of the Greeks; he died young, and the _first_ song of the Egyptian music[6] was in his honor; it was a lament over his untimely end, the swift passing away of Youth, Spring, etc. The song was sung under various guises, for Maneros, Linus, Adonis, etc., among various ancient nations, and Herodotus was surprised at hearing it in Egypt. But in course of time the song itself, and not the king’s son was called Maneros, and gradually diffused its influence, (the warning of the passing away of Joy) through Egyptian social life; at their banquets a perfectly painted statue of a _corpse_ was borne round and shown to each guest, and there was sung the following warning:
“Cast your eyes upon this corpse You will be like this after Death, Therefore drink and be merry now.”[7]
The song also from being a mournful one, became in time joyous and lively,[8] Plutarch thinks that the words Maneros, became synonymous with “Good Health.” The fashion was after the conquest of Egypt, imitated in Rome.[9] The ancient Egyptian music was really a twofold affair and is well symbolized in being attributed by some to good, by others to evil gods; for it was used in the religious services of the highest gods, (except, according to Strabo, in the services of Osiris, at Abydos) and on the other hand was degraded as a pastime for the lowest orders.
The musicians were not held in any respect, and were not allowed to change their occupation, but were obliged to transmit it from father to son and were also probably compelled to live in a certain quarter of the cities wherein they dwelt.[10]
Of course there were celebrated singers and performers, and also leaders of the chants, and royal singers, who were exceptions to the foregoing rule, but according to Diodorus Siculus, the Egyptians not only considered music a useless art, but even a hurtful one, as it enervated the soul and made man effeminate. Yet for all this there are found among ancient sculptures many representations of singers and musicians evidently belonging to the higher classes, though we cannot but believe that these exceptions only prove the rule, and even to-day music is considered a sensuous and rather unmanly art, by Eastern nations.
Among the most ancient songs of Egypt there seem to have been little refrains sung by the working classes while at labor; there is here not conjecture but absolute certainty, for the words of part of one of these songs are preserved, on an ancient picture of threshers of grain, oxen, etc.; the threshers sing, according to Champollion’s learned deciphering,
“Thresh for yourselves, oh oxen, Thresh for yourselves; Measures for your masters, Measures for yourselves.”
In a grotto at _El bersheh_ there is also a painting of the transportation of a colossal statue from the quarry, and here also while one hundred and seventy-two men are laboring at the ropes, one is perched upon the statue and is giving the time of a refrain, which all are to sing.
The custom of singing while at work still exists in Egypt, as, for example, sailors sing a particular song when starting on a voyage, another when there is danger of a collision, another when the danger is past.
Music was a chief portion of the Egyptian funeral ceremonies, and on the walls of nearly all the tombs of ancient days, are found paintings of the funeral ceremonies; the greater part of what is known of their instruments comes from this source; the best singers and players were engaged for the purpose by the richer classes, and sang mournful chants, being similar to the professional mourners at present found in the East. The music was probably chiefly melodic, or one-voiced, though this subject has some ambiguity attached to it, our only guide as to their music being the representations in the tombs, etc., as not a scrap of actual music has been left to us; but when we consider the furious controversy about, and the different interpretations of the fragments of Greek music which time has left us, this may be an _advantage_ rather than otherwise. There is one painting[11] left, which seems to confirm the idea that the Egyptians knew something of the effect of harmony. This painting represents two harpers at one side and three flute players at the other, while between them are two singers, one of whom seems to be following with his voice the melody of the harpers, while the other sings with the flutes; this seems to intimate that the Egyptians possessed, at least _two-voiced_ harmony.
Chappell, in his admirable History of Music, says that it is mathematically impossible, that all of the instruments represented in their paintings should have been played in unison.
The music of Egypt was for a long time regulated by the Government, that is all innovations were punishable by law; probably this referred only to religious music, and did not affect popular music.
In all ages there seem to have been two distinct schools of music, the scientific, and popular. There is no doubt that while the early European theorists held that _only consecutive fifths and fourths_ were musical, the populace had a less forced and more beautiful style, and it is more than probable that in Egypt the popular music was totally different from the sacred.
All the songs appear to have been accompanied by a clapping of hands, and therefore the rhythm was probably strongly marked. The effect of this clapping of hands is by no means unpleasant, and is still used by the negroes of America in some songs and dances, and among various barbarous nations. It seems curious to think, that in witnessing these lively dances, one may be beholding a counterpart of the enjoyments of four thousand years ago, or that in witnessing the _pirouettes_ of a ballet dancer, we are amusing ourselves in the ancient Egyptian manner; the latter fact is proved by ancient paintings, however. Other ancient Egyptian dances were similar to the modern jigs, clog dances and breakdowns, as is amply shown by figures found both in Upper and Lower Egypt.
The Egyptians had also dances with regular figures, forward and back, swing, etc.; these dances were restricted to the lower orders, the upper classes being forbidden to indulge in them.
Louis C. Elson's Curiosities of Music (1880) opens with a preface explaining that the chapters originally appeared in a magazine, The Vox Humana, and were compiled to present “the most curious points in the music of many nations, ancient and modern.” The catalog subject is “Music – History and criticism,” but the excerpts show a narrower emphasis: detailed accounts of Chinese and Japanese music, with briefer treatments of other cultures. Elson does not claim comprehensive scholarship; he avoids “disputed points” such as Hebrew or Greek music as “too abstruse for periodical reading.” Instead, he seeks facts that would interest a general reader, and the resulting text is a blend of reported observation, cultural comparison, and personal judgment.
Chinese Music as a Series of Contradictions
Elson devotes multiple chapters to Chinese music, describing it as “a series of contradictions” that differ from Western norms. He lists contrasts: “We mourn in black, they in white; we respect crowns as badges of honor, they the boots; we build solid walls, they make them hollow.” In music, he notes that the Chinese place the orchestra behind the stage, whereas Western practice puts it in front. He also reports that children perform in troupes, beginning training very young, and that boat races feature “deafening music” with “the sonorous noise of the tum-tum” and a clarinet that gives “perpetually the same note.” Elson quotes a description of such an event, calling the resulting sound “infernal harmony.” These details illustrate his method: he relies on secondary accounts (often unattributed) and presents them as curiosities, while adding his own interpretive frame.
Japanese Music and the Role of Women
In the chapter on Japan, Elson observes that “the female sex are proficient in the art,” contrasting with Chinese custom. He notes that Japanese songs “do not appear to ha” (the excerpt cuts off), but he states that the Japanese musical system “has never been carefully formed or elucidated.” He compares Japanese and Chinese music, finding “many and irreconcilable” contradictions despite apparent affinity. Elson’s treatment of Japan is briefer than that of China, and he does not provide the same level of descriptive detail. The excerpts suggest that his interest lies more in cataloging differences than in systematic analysis. The incomplete sentence is a reminder that the digital text is a selection; the full chapter may contain further observations.
Elson’s Editorial Voice and Cultural Commentary
Throughout the excerpts, Elson interjects personal opinions and cultural judgments. Of China, he writes that its “heaviest drawbacks, in music, as well as in all civilization, seem to be, a senseless clinging to ancient usages; an education of the head, and not of the heart; an etiquette which becomes both ludicrous and burdensome.” He speculates on future progress, noting that Japan had recently made “giant strides” and that China might experience a similar awakening. These passages reveal Elson’s late-19th-century perspective: he treats non-Western music as exotic material for a Western audience, and he measures other cultures against Western norms. The book’s title promises “facts not generally known,” but the excerpts show that Elson’s facts are often filtered through his own biases and the limitations of his sources.
Readers should approach Curiosities of Music as a period document rather than a reliable survey. Elson’s reliance on magazine-length chapters and secondary sources means that his claims—especially about Chinese and Japanese music—should be verified against modern scholarship. The book is most valuable for what it reveals about 19th-century attitudes toward non-Western cultures and the state of musical knowledge at the time. The excerpts provide a starting point for comparing Elson’s descriptions with contemporary accounts.
I keep thinking about how Elson’s book treats old music as something alive, not just preserved—how those ancient chants and instruments still carry a pulse. It reminded me of turning through that old hymnal, where the same feeling lingers: voices finding shape across centuries. There’s a quiet comfort in that continuity. The St. Gregory Hymnal and Catholic Choir Book — Context and Discussion stayed with me the same way, like a familiar hush after singing.
Emma Clark
2 weeks agoHarper Miller
2 weeks agoOlivia Nelson
1 month agoMichael Jones
3 weeks agoHow will you remember this book?
Save your reaction, strongest insight, and memorable passage.
Ava Thomas
1 week ago