Observations on the Florid Song; Or, Sentiments on the Ancient and Modern Singers — Themes and Context

(2 User reviews)   355
In Category - Opera Performance
Tosi, Pier Francesco, 1653?-1732, Galliard, John Ernest, -1747 [Translator] Project Gutenberg 2008
Singing; Performance practice (Music) -- Early works to 1800 Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 33,920
Reading time 148 min
Text sections 5

Observations on the Florid Song; Or, Sentiments on the Ancient and Modern Singers — Themes and Context can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 33,920 words, 2 hr 28 min estimated reading time, and 5 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 29.1 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Singing,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Pier Francesco Tosi's 1723 treatise on florid singing, translated by John Ernest Galliard in 1743, contrasts ancient and modern vocal practices through pointed dialogue and vivid metaphors, revealing the author's conservative stance on ornamentation, taste, and the decline of the pathetic style.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.7/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

Singing was full of Expression and Passion; chiefly in the Stile of Chamber-Musick. The best Performers in his Time thought themselves happy when they could have an Opportunity to hear him. After he had lost his Voice, he apply'd himself more particularly to Composition; of which he has given Proof in his _Cantata's_, which are of an exquisite Taste, especially in the _Recitatives_, where he excels in the _Pathetick_ and _Expression_ beyond any other. He was a zealous Well-wisher to all who distinguished themselves in Musick; but rigorous to those who abused and degraded the Profession. He was very much esteemed by Persons of Rank among whom the late Earl of _Peterborough_ was one, having often met him in his Travels beyond Sea; and he was well received by his Lordship when in _England_, to Whom he dedicated this Treatise. This alone would be a sufficient Indication of his Merit, his being taken Notice of by a Person of that Quality, and distinguishing Taste. The Emperor _Joseph_ gave him an honourable Employment _Arch-Duchess_ a Church-Retirement in some part of _Italy_, and the late _Flanders_, where he died. As for his _Observations_ and _Sentiments_ on Singing, they must speak for themselves; and the Translation of them, it is hoped, will be acceptable to Lovers of Musick, because this particular Branch has never been treated of in so distinct and ample a Manner by any other Author. Besides, it has been thought by Persons of Judgment, that it would be of Service to make the Sentiments of our Author more universally known, when a false Taste in Musick is so prevailing; and, that these Censures, as they are passed by an _Italian_ upon his own Countrymen, cannot but be looked upon as impartial. It is incontestable, that the Neglect of true Study, the sacrificing the Beauty of the Voice to a Number of ill-regulated Volubilities, the neglecting the Pronunciation and Expression of the Words, besides many other Things taken Notice of in this Treatise, are all _bad_. The Studious will find, that our Author's Remarks will be of Advantage, not only to Vocal Performers, but likewise to the Instrumental, where Taste and a Manner are required; and shew, that a little less _Fiddling_ with the _Voice_, and a little more _Singing_ with the _Instrument_, would be of great Service to Both. Whosoever reads this Treatise with Application, cannot fail of Improvement by it. It is hoped, that the Translation will be indulged, if, notwithstanding all possible Care, it should be defective in the Purity of the _English_ Language! it being almost impossible (considering the Stile of our Author, which is a little more figurative than the present Taste of the _English_ allows in their Writings,) not to retain something of the Idiom of the Original; but where the Sense of the Matter is made plain, the Stile may not be thought so material, in Writings of this Kind.

Excellency the Earl of PETERBOROUGH, General of the Marines of _Great-Britain_.

I Should be afraid of leaving the World under the Imputation of Ingratitude, should I any longer defer publishing the very many Favours, which _Your Lordship_ so generously has bestow'd on me in _Italy_, in _Germany_, in _Flanders_, in _England_; and principally at your delightful Seat at _Parson's-Green_, where _Your Lordship_ having been pleased to do me the Honour of imparting to me your Thoughts with Freedom, I have often had the Opportunity of admiring your extensive Knowledge, which almost made me overlook the Beauty and Elegance of the Place. The famous _Tulip-Tree_, in your Garden there is not so surprising a Rarity, as the uncommon Penetration of your Judgment, which has sometimes (I may say) foretold Events, which have afterwards come to pass. But what Return can I make for so great Obligations, when the mentioning of them is doing myself an Honour, and the very Acknowledgment has the Appearance of _Vanity_? It is better therefore to treasure them up in my Heart, and remain respectfully silent; only making an humble Request to _Your Lordship_ that you will condescend favourably to accept this mean Offering of my OBSERVATIONS; which I am induc'd to make, from the common Duty which lies upon every Professor to preserve Musick in its Perfection; and upon Me in particular, for having been the first, or among the first, of those who discovered the noble Genius of your potent and generous Nation for it. However, I should not have presum'd to dedicate them to a Hero adorn'd with such glorious Actions, if _Singing_ was not a Delight of the Soul, or if any one had a Soul more sensible of its Charms. On which account, I think, I have a just Pretence to declare myself, with profound Obsequiousness,

YOUR LORDSHIP'S _Most humble_, _Most devoted and_ _Most oblig'd Servant_, Pier. Francesco Tosi.

Observations for one who teaches a _Soprano_.

Of the _Appoggiatura_.

Observations for a _Student_.

Observations for a _Singer_.

Of _Passages_ or _Graces_.

The Opinions of the ancient Historians, on the Origin of Musick, are various. _Pliny_ believes that _Amphion_ was the Inventor of it; the _Grecians_ maintain, that it was _Dionysius_; _Polybius_ ascribes it to the _Arcadians_; _Suidas_ and _Boetius_ give the Glory entirely to _Pythagoras_; asserting, that from the Sound of three Hammers of different Weights at a Smith's Forge, he found out the Diatonick; after which _Timotheus_, the _Milesian_, added the Chromatick, and _Olympicus_, or _Olympus_, the Enharmonick Scale. However, we read in holy Writ, that _Jubal_, of the Race of _Cain, fuit Pater Canentium Cithara & Organo_, the Father of all such as handle the Harp and Organ; Instruments, in all Probability consisting of several harmonious Sounds; from whence one may infer, Musick to have had its Birth very soon after the World.

Sec. 2. To secure her from erring, she called to her Assistance many Precepts of the Mathematicks; and from the Demonstrations of her Beauties, by Means of Lines, Numbers, and Proportions, she was adopted her Child, and became a Science.

Sec. 3. It may reasonably be supposed that, during the Course of several thousand Years, Musick has always been the Delight of Mankind; since the excessive Pleasure, the _Lacedemonians_ received from it, induced that Republick to exile the abovementioned _Milesian_, that the _Spartans_, freed from their Effeminacy, might return again to their old Oeconomy.

Sec. 4. But, I believe, she never appeared with so much Majesty as in the last Centuries, in the great Genius of _Palestrina_, whom she left as an immortal Example to Posterity. And, in Truth, Musick, with the Sweetness of _his_ Harmony, arrived at so high a Pitch (begging Pardon of the eminent Masters of our Days), that if she was ranked only in the Number of Liberal Arts, she might with Justice contest the Pre-eminence[1].

Sec. 5. A strong Argument offers itself to me, from that wonderful Impression, that in so distinguished a Manner is made upon our Souls by Musick, beyond all other Arts; which leads us to believe that it is part of that Blessedness which is enjoyed in Paradise.

Sec. 6. Having premised these Advantages, the Merit of the Singer should likewise be distinguished, by reason of the particular Difficulties that attend him: Let a Singer have a Fund of Knowledge sufficient to perform readily any of the most difficult Compositions; let him have, besides, an excellent Voice, and know how to use it artfully; he will not, for all that, deserve a Character of Distinction, if he is wanting in a prompt Variation; a Difficulty which other Arts are not liable to.

Sec. 7. Finally, I say, that Poets[2], Painters, Sculptors, and even Composers of Musick, before they expose their Works to the Publick, have all the Time requisite to mend and polish them; but the Singer that commits an Error has no Remedy; for the Fault is committed, and past Correction.

Sec. 8. We may then guess at but cannot describe, how great the Application must be of one who is obliged not to err, in unpremeditated Productions; and to manage a Voice, always in Motion, conformable to the Rules of an Art that is so difficult. I confess ingeniously, that every time I reflect on the Insufficiency of many Masters, and the infinite Abuses they introduce, which render the Application and Study of their Scholars ineffectual, I cannot but wonder, that among so many Professors of the first Rank, who have written so amply on Musick in almost all its Branches, there has never been one, at least that I have heard of, who has undertaken to explain in the Art of Singing, any thing more than the first Elements, known to all, concealing the most necessary Rules for Singing well. It is no Excuse to say, that the Composers intent on Composition, the Performers on Instruments intent on their Performance, should not meddle with what concerns the Singer; for I know some very capable to undeceive those who may think so. The incomparable _Zarlino_, in the third part of his Harmonick Institution, chap. 46, just began to inveigh against those, who in his time sung with some Defects, but he stopped; and I am apt to believe had he gone farther, his Documents, though grown musty in two Centuries, might be of Service to the refined Taste of this our present time. But a more just Reproof is due to the Negligence of many celebrated Singers, who, having a superior Knowledge, can the less justify their Silence, even under the Title of Modesty, which ceases to be a Virtue, when it deprives the Publick of an Advantage. Moved therefore, not by a vain Ambition, but by the Hopes of being of Service to several Professors, I have determined, not without Reluctance, to be the first to expose to the Eye of the World these my few Observations; my only End being (if I succeed) to give farther Insight to the Master, the Scholar, and the Singer.

Sec. 9. I will in the first Place, endeavour to shew the Duty of a Master, how to instruct a Beginner well; secondly, what is required of the Scholar; and, lastly, with more mature Reflections, to point out the way to a moderate Singer, by which he may arrive at greater Perfection. Perhaps my Enterprize may be term'd rash, but if the Effects should not answer my Intentions, I shall at least incite some other to treat of it in a more ample and correct Manner.

Sec. 10. If any should say, I might be dispensed with for not publishing Things already known to every Professor, he might perhaps deceive himself; for among these Observations there are many, which as I have never heard them made by anybody else, I shall look upon as my own; and such probably they are, from their not being generally known. Let them therefore take their Chance, for the Approbation of those that have Judgment and Taste.

Sec. 11. It would be needless to say, that verbal Instructions can be of no Use to Singers, any farther than to prevent 'em from falling into Errors, and that it is Practice only can set them right. However, from the Success of these, I shall be encouraged to go on to make new Discoveries for the Advantage of the Profession, or (asham'd, but not surpriz'd) I will bear it patiently, if Masters with their Names to their Criticism should kindly publish my Ignorance, that I may be undeceiv'd, and thank them.

Sec. 12. But though it is my Design to Demonstrate a great Number of Abuses and Defects of the Moderns to be met with in the Republick of Musick, in order that they may be corrected (if they can); I would not have those, who for want of Genius, or through Negligence in their Study, could not, or would not improve themselves, imagine that out of Malice I have painted all their Imperfections to the Life; for I solemnly protest, that though from my too great Zeal I attack their Errors without Ceremony, I have a Respect for their Persons; having learned from a _Spanish_ Proverb, that Calumny recoils back on the Author. But Christianity says something more. I speak in general; but if sometimes I am more particular, let it be known, that I copy from no other Original than myself, where there has been, and still is Matter enough to criticize, without looking for it elsewhere.

OBSERVATIONS _for one who teaches a_ Soprano.[3]

The Faults in Singing insinuate themselves so easily into the Minds of young Beginners, and there are such Difficulties in correcting them, when grown into an Habit that it were to be wish'd, the ablest Singers would undertake the Task of Teaching, they best knowing how to conduct the Scholar from the first Elements to Perfection. But there being none, (if I mistake not) but who abhor the Thoughts of it, we must reserve them for those Delicacies of the Art, which enchant the Soul.

Sec. 2. Therefore the first Rudiments necessarily fall to a Master of a lower Rank, till the Scholar can sing his part at Sight; whom one would at least wish to be an honest Man, diligent and experienced, without the Defects of singing through the Nose, or in the Throat, and that he have a Command of Voice, some Glimpse of a good Taste, able to make himself understood with Ease, a perfect Intonation, and a Patience to endure the severe Fatigue of a most tiresome Employment.

Sec. 3. Let a Master thus qualified before he begins his Instructions, read the four Verses of _Virgil_, _Sic vos non vobis_, &c.[5] for they seem to be made[4] on Purpose for him, and after having considered them well, let him consult his Resolution; because (to speak plainly) it is mortifying to help another to Affluence, and be in want of it himself. If the Singer should make his Fortune, it is but just the Master, to whom it has been owing, should be also a Sharer in it.

Sec. 4. But above all, let him hear with a disinterested Ear, whether the Person desirous to learn hath a Voice, and a Disposition; that he may not be obliged to give a strict Account to God, of the Parent's Money ill spent, and the Injury done to the Child, by the irreparable Loss of Time, which might have been more profitably employed in some other Profession. I do not speak at random. The ancient Masters made a Distinction between the Rich, that learn'd Musick as an Accomplishment, and the Poor, who studied it for a Livelihood. The first they instructed out of Interest, and the latter out of Charity, if they discovered a singular Talent. Very few modern Masters refuse Scholars; and, provided they are paid, little do they care if their greediness ruins the Profession.

Sec. 5. Gentlemen Masters! _Italy_ hears no more such exquisite Voices as in Times past, particularly among the Women, and to the Shame of the Guilty I'll tell the Reason: The Ignorance of the Parents does not let them perceive the Badness of the Voice of their Children, as their Necessity makes them believe, that to sing and grow rich is one and the same Thing, and to learn Musick, it is enough to have a pretty Face: "_Can you make anything of her?_"

Sec. 6. You may, perhaps, teach them with their Voice----Modesty will not permit me to explain myself farther.

Sec. 7. The Master must want Humanity, if he advises a Scholar to do any thing to the Prejudice of the Soul.

Sec. 8. From the first Lesson to the last, let the Master remember, that he is answerable for any Omission in his Instructions, and for the Errors he did not correct.

Sec. 9. Let him be moderately severe, making himself fear'd, but not hated. I know, it is not easy to find the Mean between Severity and Mildness, but I know also, that both Extremes are bad: Too great Severity creates Stubbornness, and too great Mildness Contempt.

Sec. 10. I shall not speak of the Knowledge of the Notes, of their Value, of Time, of Pauses, of the Accidents, nor of other such trivial Beginnings, because they are generally known.

Sec. 11. Besides the _C_ Cliff, let the Scholar be instructed in all the other Cliffs, and in all their Situations, that he may not be liable to what often happens to some Singers, who, in Compositions _Alla Capella_,[6] know not how to distinguish the _Mi_ from the _Fa_, without the Help of the Organ, for want of the Knowledge of the _G_ Cliff; from whence such Discordancies arise in divine Service, that it is a Shame for those who grow old in their Ignorance. I must be so sincere to declare, that whoever does not give such essential Instructions, transgresses out of Omission, or out of Ignorance.[7]

Sec. 12. Next let him learn to read those in _B Molle_, especially in those[8] Compositions that have four Flats at the Cliff, and which on the sixth of the Bass require for the most part an accidental Flat, that the Scholar may find in them the _Mi_, which is not so easy to one who has studied but little, and thinks that all the Notes with a Flat are called _Fa_: for if that were true, it would be superfluous that the Notes should be six, when five of them have the same Denomination. The _French_ use seven, and, by that additional Name, save their scholars the Trouble of learning the Mutations ascending or descending; but we _Italians_ have but _Ut_, _Re_, _Mi_, _Fa_, _Sol_, _La_; Notes which equally suffice throughout all the Keys, to one who knows how to read them.[9]

Sec. 13. Let the Master do his utmost, to make the Scholar hit and sound the Notes perfectly in Tune in _Sol-Fa_-ing. One, who has not a good Ear, should not undertake either to instruct, or to sing; it being intolerable to hear a Voice perpetually rise and fall discordantly. Let the Instructor reflect on it; for one that sings out of Tune loses all his other Perfections. I can truly say, that, except in some few Professors, that modern Intonation is very bad.

Sec. 14. In the _Sol-Fa_-ing, let him endeavour to gain by Degrees the high Notes, that by the Help of this Exercise he may acquire as much Compass of the Voice as possible. Let him take care, however, that the higher the Notes, the more it is necessary to touch them with Softness, to avoid Screaming.

Sec. 15. He ought to make him hit the Semitones according to the true Rules. Every one knows not that there is a Semitone Major and Minor,[10] because the Difference cannot be known by an Organ or Harpsichord, if the Keys of the Instrument are not split. A Tone, that gradually passes to another, is divided into nine almost imperceptible Intervals, which are called Comma's, five of which constitute the Semitone Major, and four the Minor. Some are of Opinion, that there are no more than seven, and that the greatest Number of the one half constitutes the first, and the less the second; but this does not satisfy my weak Understanding, for the Ear would find no Difficulty to distinguish the seventh part of a Tone; whereas it meets with a very great one to distinguish the ninth. If one were continually to sing only to those abovemention'd Instruments, this Knowledge might be unnecessary; but since the time that Composers introduced the Custom of crowding the Opera's with a vast Number of Songs accompanied with Bow Instruments, it becomes so necessary, that if a _Soprano_ was to sing _D_ sharp, like _E_ flat, a nice Ear will find he is out of Tune, because this last rises. Whoever is not satisfied in this, let him read those Authors who treat of it, and let him consult the best Performers on the Violin. In the middle parts, however, it is not so easy to distinguish the Difference; tho' I am of Opinion, that every thing that is divisible, is to be distinguished. Of these two Semitones, I'll speak more amply in the Chapter of the _Appoggiatura_, that the one may not be confounded with the other.

Sec. 16. Let him teach the Scholar to hit the Intonation of any Interval in the Scale perfectly and readily, and keep him strictly to this important Lesson, if he is desirous he should sing with Readiness in a short time.

Sec. 17. If the Master does not understand Composition, let him provide himself with good Examples of _Sol-Fa_-ing in divers Stiles, which insensibly lead from the most easy to the more difficult, according as he finds the Scholar improves; with this Caution, that however difficult, they may be always natural and agreeable, to induce the Scholar to study with Pleasure.

Pier Francesco Tosi's Observations on the Florid Song opens with a striking prefatory address that immediately establishes the translator's agenda: to make 'a famous Italian Master' familiar to England. The work itself, originally published in Bologna in 1723 and translated by John Ernest Galliard in 1743, is structured as a series of numbered paragraphs that blend technical instruction with polemical commentary. Tosi's voice emerges through a distinctive rhetorical strategy: he frequently stages imaginary dialogues with unnamed 'Modern' singers, allowing their brash assertions to serve as foils for his own conservative views. The translator's note clarifies that 'by the Ancient, our Author means those who liv'd about thirty or forty Years ago'—a temporal frame that already signals the treatise's preoccupation with recent decline rather than remote history.

Dialogue as Polemical Device

Tosi repeatedly constructs confrontational exchanges to dramatize the clash between old and new schools. In one such passage, he recounts asking a modern composer 'from whom he had learned the Counterpoint?' only to be met with the retort: 'What Tone! what Tone! (breaking in upon me abruptly) with what musty Questions are you going to disturb my Brains?' The imagined interlocutor dismisses traditional modal theory, declaring that 'the Moderns, if you do not know it, acknowledge no other Tone but one.' This device allows Tosi to ventriloquize the very attitudes he condemns, making his own positions clearer by contrast. The dialogue form also injects a dramatic, almost theatrical energy into what might otherwise be a dry pedagogical text.

The Pathetic Style Under Siege

Tosi laments that modern singers have 'banish for ever the Pathetick' because 'we will have no Melancholy.' This complaint is not merely aesthetic but moral: he associates the loss of pathos with a broader corruption of musical purpose. In a striking metaphor, he warns that church music risks being degraded to 'Jiggs, Minuets, and Furlana's' if money were taken at the doors—a jab at the commercialization of sacred spaces. The translator's annotations, marked by bracketed numbers, occasionally gloss these references, but Tosi's own prose carries the argument through vivid, almost satirical imagery. His insistence on the primacy of vocal music over instrumental, and on the voice's power to 'express Sounds with greater Nicety and Exactness,' underpins his defense of the older, more expressive style.

Metaphors of Decay and Defense

Tosi's language is rich with metaphors that frame musical change as decline. The moderns, he writes, 'strive who can produce most extravagant Absurdities never heard before,' and they boast of their inventions while 'Envy burst.' He depicts the ancient style as beleaguered: a musician not of the modern 'Tribe' will 'find no Patron or Admirer,' and a few syllables—'He is an Ancient'—suffice to ruin him. Yet Tosi also grants his opponents a voice, as when the modern defender claims that 'our delicious Stile has been invented to hide with the fine Name of Modern the too difficult Rules of the Counterpoint.' This concession, placed in the mouth of the adversary, subtly acknowledges that the new style may be a response to complexity, even as Tosi rejects it.

The Translator's Mediating Role

John Ernest Galliard's translation is itself a layer of interpretation. His prefatory discourse addresses 'ALL Lovers of MUSICK' and frames the work as a service to the public, claiming he was 'more easily prevail'd upon to engage in this Work' to make Tosi 'familiar to England.' Galliard adds 'Explanatory Annotations, and Examples in Musick,' though the excerpts here include only the bracketed footnote numbers without the actual notes. The translator's presence is felt in the polished eighteenth-century English prose, which smooths Tosi's Italian into a flowing, argumentative style. The note on the meaning of 'Ancient' and 'Modern' is a crucial editorial intervention, defining terms that might otherwise confuse readers unfamiliar with the narrow temporal window Tosi intends.

Readers approaching this treatise should attend to the interplay between Tosi's numbered paragraphs and the imagined dialogues that puncture them. The work is less a systematic manual than a series of pointed observations, each carrying the weight of personal experience and partisan conviction. Galliard's translation preserves the combative energy of the original, making it a document not only of vocal pedagogy but of the cultural wars that surrounded Italian opera in the early eighteenth century. The annotations, though absent from this excerpt, likely amplify the technical dimension; even without them, the text rewards attention to its rhetorical strategies and historical specificity.

Tosi’s jealousy for the “pathetic style” always makes me a little melancholy, as if he’s mourning something already slipping away in 1723. I feel that same ache when I open Physiology of the Opera — A Reader’s Guide, which watches a later, brasher age from the wings. Both are private elegies for a kind of singing that now only hums between the lines.

Olivia Walker
3 weeks ago

Amelia Garcia
1 week ago

5
5 out of 5 (2 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

Your personal reading reflection

Build a private reading journal entry for this title.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

What is your current status with this title?

2

How much did you enjoy the reading experience?

3

Would you pass this book on to a friend?

4

Did the language feel accessible?

Related eBooks