The Great Musicians: Rossini and His School — Text and Context
Edition facts
For The Great Musicians: Rossini and His School — Text and Context, the stored edition analysis reports 44,933 words, 3 hr 16 min estimated reading time, and 5 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 16.1 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Rossini, Gioacchino, 1792-1868,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
ROSSINI'S CHILDHOOD AND YOUTH.
A contemporary of Cimarosa and of Paisiello, his predecessors, but not, except at the very outset of his career, his models, and of Donizetti, Bellini, and Verdi, his successors, and in an artistic sense his followers, Rossini is a central figure in the nineteenth-century history of Italian music.
Lives of Rossini have been published freely enough during the last fifty or sixty years. It but rarely happens, even to the greatest man, to have his biography written or his statue erected during his lifetime. But Rossini lived so long that it seemed impossible to wait for his death; and more than one writer seized upon him when he was still a young man. Perhaps it occurred to the Abbé Carpani, the first of Rossini's biographers, that he was already approaching the critical age at which so many great composers--not to speak of painters and poets--had ceased not only to work but to live; Mozart, for instance, Cimarosa, Weber, Hérold, Bellini, Schubert, and Mendelssohn. It has been suggested, indeed, that Rossini might perhaps have wished his career to be measured against those of so many other composers whose days were cut short at about the age he had attained when he produced _William Tell_. Rossini was but thirty-seven when _William Tell_, his last work for the stage, and his last work of any importance with the exception of the _Stabat Mater_ was brought out. But when, soon after the production of _Semiramide_, played for the first time in 1823, Stendhal published that _Life of Rossini_ which is known to be founded almost entirely on the Abbé Carpani's work, Rossini, at the age of thirty-one, had already completed the most important portion of his artistic life. Readable, interesting, and in many places charming, Stendhal's _Life of Rossini_ is at the same time meagre, and, worse still, untrustworthy. But there is no reason why a tolerable Life of Rossini, including an account of all the changes and reforms introduced by this composer into Italian opera, should not have been published when he was only thirty-one years of age. There would have been nothing of moment to add to it but a narrative of Rossini's visit to London, of his residence in Paris, and above all, of the circumstances under which he produced _William Tell_ together with his reasons--if they could only be discovered--for abandoning composition when he had once produced that work.
The life of Rossini divides itself, more naturally than most things to which this favourite mode of division is applied, into three parts. During the first period of his existence, extending from his birth to the year 1823 when _Semiramide_ was brought out, he made his reputation. From 1823 when he visited London and Paris, until 1829 when he produced his great masterpiece in the serious style, and afterwards threw down his pen for ever, he made his fortune. Finally, from 1829, the year of _William Tell_, until 1869, the year of his death, he enjoyed his fortune and his reputation; caring not too much for either, and so little desirous to increase the former that he abandoned his "author's rights" in France--fees, that is to say, which he was entitled to receive for the representation of his works--to the Society of Musical Composers.
Rossini made his appearance in public when he was only seven years of age; doing so not, it need scarcely be said, in the character of a composer, but in that of a singer. It was in Paer's _Camilla_, composed for Vienna and afterwards brought out at Bologna, that Rossini, in the year 1799, took the part of a child. "Nothing," says Madame Giorgi-Righetti, the original Rosina in the _Barber of Seville_,[1] "could be more tender, more touching, than the voice and action of this extraordinary child in the beautiful canon of the third act; _senti si fiero instante_. The Bolognese of that time declared that he would some day be one of the greatest musicians known. I need not say whether the prophecy has been verified."
Gioachino Antonio Rossini was born on the 29th February, 1792; and the circumstance of his having come into the world in a leap-year justified him, he used to maintain, in counting his birthday, not annually according to the usual custom, but once every four years. According to this method of computation he had numbered nineteen birthdays when, at the age of seventy-seven, he died. What is better worth remembering is the fact that Rossini was born, as if by way of compensation, the very year in which Mozart died; Mozart who, indebted to the Italians for much of the sweetness and singableness of his lovely melodies, was to give to Italy, through Rossini, new instrumental combinations, new dramatic methods, and new operatic forms.
It may have been very desirable to show that Rossini was of distinguished ancestry, and that he had a great-uncle, who, in the middle of the sixteenth century, was governor of Ravenna. But it is more interesting to know that he was of good musical parentage. His father, it is true, was nothing more than town trumpeter at Pesaro; herald and crier, that is to say, to the sound of the trumpet. But his mother was what musicians call "an artist." She possessed a very beautiful voice; and when the town trumpeter fell ill or in some other manner incapacitated himself for supporting the family, she replaced him as bread-winner by taking an engagement as an operatic singer. According to one of Rossini's biographers, Rossini the trumpeter came to grief through his political opinions, which were of a more decided character than any that were ever professed, publicly at least, by his eminent son. When, after the Italian campaign, the French army in 1796 entered Pesaro, the old Rossini so far forgot his official position and the duty he owed to the state, as to proclaim his sympathy and admiration for the Republican troops; on whose retirement he was punished for his want of loyalty, being first deprived of his employment and afterwards cast into prison.
The trumpet was not the only instrument cultivated by the elder Rossini. He also played the horn; playing it, not like an ordinary town crier, from whom only a few loud flourishes would be expected by way of preliminary announcement, but in true musicianly style.
The horn, eighty years ago, was not a very important instrument in Italian orchestration. But such as it was the elder Rossini played it in more than one operatic band; and in due time, and to all appearances as soon as it was physically possible to do so, the father taught the art of playing the horn to his precocious son. Rossini was still very young when he accompanied his parents on musical excursions, or "tours" as they would now be called; and on these occasions, when the father took the part of first horn in some local orchestra--which was sometimes nothing more than the band of a travelling show--the part of second horn was assigned to the son. The mother at the same time sang on the stage. Rossini, then, at once vocalist and instrumentalist, began his career in both characters at a very early age. It has been seen that at seven he appeared on the stage as an operatic singer. Between the ages of seven and twelve he was much occupied in horn playing; and his performances in company with his father had probably some effect in developing that taste for wind instruments and especially for horns, for which his orchestration was one day to be remarkable.
In his thirteenth year Rossini was taken to Bologna and presented to Professor Tesci of that city. The professor heard the little boy sing and play, and was so pleased with his performances that he procured him an engagement as chorister in one of the local churches. It was of this period in Rossini's life that Heine was thinking when, in his well-known article on Rossini's _Stabat Mater_, he wrote: "The true character of Christian art does not reside in thinness and plainness of the body, but in a certain effervescence of the soul which neither the musician nor the painter can appropriate to himself either by baptism or by study; and in this respect I find in the _Stabat_ of Rossini a more truly Christian character than in the _Paulus_ of Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy; an oratorio which the adversaries of Rossini point to as a model of the Christian style. Heaven preserve me from wishing to express by that the least blame against a master so full of merits as the composer of _Paulus_; and the author of these letters is less likely than any one to wish to criticise the Christian character of the oratorio in question from clerical, or, so to say, pharisaical reasons. I cannot, however, avoid pointing out that at the age when Mendelssohn commenced Christianity at Berlin (he was only baptized in his thirteenth year), Rossini had already deserted it a little, and had lost himself entirely in the mundane music of operas. Now he has again abandoned the latter to carry himself back in dreams to the Catholic recollections of his first youth--to the days when he sang as a child in the choir of the Pesaro [for which read Bologna] cathedral, and took part as an acolyte in the service of the holy mass."
Besides enabling him to earn money by singing in the churches, Professor Tesci gave his young friend lessons in singing and pianoforte playing, so that after two years he could execute the most difficult music at first sight. He now was found competent to act as musical director, and accepted an engagement in that character with a travelling company which gave performances at various little towns in the Romagna. When he was fifteen years of age Rossini gave up his engagement as director to the wandering troop and went back to Bologna, where (1807) he was admitted as a student to the Lyceum. Such application and such intelligence did he now show, that after he had been but one year at the academy he was chosen by the director, Professor Mattei, to compose the cantata expected annually from the Lyceum's best pupil.
Rossini's first work, written when he was sixteen years of age and executed at the Lyceum of Bologna in 1808, was the cantata in question, which, if not based on the favourite subject of Orpheus, was at least connected with it. _Pianto d'Armonia per la Morte d'Orfeo_ was at once the subject and the title of this memorable composition. At this period Rossini was an ardent student of Haydn's symphonies and quartets; and after the production of his cantata, which obtained remarkable success, he was appointed director of the Philharmonic concerts, and profited by his position to give a performance of Haydn's _Seasons_. A distinct reminiscence of this time, and more than a distinct reminiscence of one of the best known melodies in the _Seasons_, was to be found eight years afterwards in the lively trio ("Zitti, Zitti") of _The Barber of Seville_.
During his studies at the Lyceum Rossini did not neglect the piano. He entertained a high respect for this admirable instrument, this orchestra on a reduced scale, minus, of course, the variety of _timbres_; and one of his latest works was a fantasia for pianoforte on airs from _L'Africaine_, dedicated to his friend Meyerbeer. Rossini used at this time to style himself "pianist of the fourth class;" and that he obtained no higher rank in the pianistic hierarchy is perhaps due to the peculiarity of the instruction he received from his professor at the Lyceum of Bologna, Signor Prinetti. Prinetti taught his pupils to play the scales with the first finger and thumb. A pianist taught to depend on his first finger and thumb to the neglect of the three other fingers could scarcely be expected to graduate very highly in the pianoforte schools.
Rossini was just seventeen years of age when he produced his first symphony, which was followed by a quartet; and a year later he brought out his first opera. During his musical travels in the Romagna, where, among other places, he was in the habit of visiting Lugo, Ferrara, Forli, and Sinigaglia, he had, at the last-named place, inspired with confidence the Marquis Cavalli, director of the local theatre. The marquis was also impresario of the San Mosè Theatre at Venice (the San Mosè, like most other Italian theatres, took its name from the parish to which it belonged), and he wished Rossini to compose an opera for his Venetian establishment. Rossini's previous work had been performed before the professor's pupils and a few invited friends at the Lyceum of Bologna. The opera ordered by the Marquis Cavalli was the first of his works performed before the general public. It was a one-act piece, entitled _La Cambiale di Matrimonio_. It was given for the first time in 1810 when Rossini was just eighteen years old. The sum paid for it was 200 francs, or, in English money, 8_l._
_La Cambiale di Matrimonio_ was succeeded by a cantata on the oft-treated subject of the abandonment of Dido. _Didone Abbandonata_ was composed for a relative, the brilliant Esther Mombelli, and it was performed in 1811. The same year Rossini brought out at Bologna _L'Equivoco Stravagante_, an _opera buffa_ in two acts. In this work, of which nothing seems to have been preserved, the concerted pieces were much admired. The final rondo, too, is still cited as a type of those final airs for which Rossini seemed to have a particular taste until, after producing the most brilliant specimen of the style in the "Non più mesta" of _Cinderella_, he left them to the care of other less original composers; for of Rossini's final airs "Non più mesta" was the final one of all.
None of Rossini's earlier operas were engraved; a circumstance which allowed him to borrow from them the best pieces for other works, but which also prevents us in the present day from arriving at any precise idea as to their value and importance.
The first opera of Rossini's which, years afterwards, was deemed worthy the honour of a revival was _L'Inganno Felice_, composed in 1812 for Venice. It was brought out at Paris in 1819; and the impresario, Barbaja, for whom Rossini composed so many admirable works, gave it at Vienna, where he was carrying on an operatic enterprise simultaneously with two other operatic enterprises at Milan and at Naples.
_L'Inganno Felice_ was the first opera by which Rossini made a decided mark, and such was its success that he was now requested to furnish works for Ferrara, Milan, and Rome. For Ferrara he was to compose an oratorio.
But although _Ciro in Babilonia_ is generally described in the catalogues of Rossini's works as an oratorio, yet, like _Mosè in Egitto_ composed six years later, it was an opera so far as regards form, and was only called an oratorio from the circumstance of its being given in Lent without the usual stage accessories. _Ciro in Babilonia_ was by no means successful as a whole. The composer, however, saved from the wreck of his oratorio two valuable fragments: a chorus which afterwards figured in _Aureliano in Palmira_, and from which he borrowed the theme of Almaviva's beautiful solo in _The Barber of Seville_, "Ecco ridente il cielo;" and the concerted finale which, in the year 1827, found its way into the French version of _Mosè in Egitto_.
Some forty years after the production of _Ciro in Babilonia_ Rossini spoke to Ferdinand Hiller (who has recorded the words in his highly interesting _Conversations with Rossini_) of a poor woman who had only one good note in her voice, which he accordingly made her repeat while the melody of the solo given to her in _Ciro_ was played by the orchestra. So in the French burlesque of _Les Saltimbanques_, an untaught player of the trombone is introduced, who, being able to play but one note, is told that that will suffice, and that if he keeps strictly to it "the lovers of that note will be delighted."
LA PIETRA DEL PARAGONE.
Rossini had already written two operas in 1812, and he was destined in this fertile year to produce three more: two at Venice, _La Scala di Seta_ and _L'Occasione fa il Ladro_; and one at Milan, _La Pietra del Paragone_.
_La Pietra del Paragone_ was Rossini's next great success after _L'Inganno Felice_. The leading parts were assigned to Galli, afterwards one of the most famous bass-singers of his time, and to Madame Marcolini, who had played the principal character in _L'Equivoco Stravagante_, and who had particularly distinguished herself in that work by her singing of the final rondo before mentioned.
In _La Pietra del Paragone_ Madame Marcolini was furnished with a final rondo of the pattern already approved, and in this, as in the earlier one, she gained a most brilliant success.
The libretto of _La Pietra del Paragone_ is founded on an idea at least as old as that of _Timon of Athens_. Count Asdrubal, surrounded by friends and beloved by a charming young lady, is rash enough to wish to know whether the friendship and the love he seems to have inspired are due to himself and his own personal qualities, or to the riches he is known to possess. To determine the point he causes a bill of exchange for a large sum to be presented at his house. He himself appears in disguise to claim the money; and, in accordance with instructions given beforehand, the count's steward recognises the signature and honours the draft. The sum for which the bill has been made out is so large that to pay it the count's exchequer is absolutely drained. Some few of the friends stand the test well enough, but others, as might have been expected, prove insincere. As for the young lady, the "touchstone" has the effect of bringing out her character in the brightest colours. Timid by nature, she had hitherto refrained from expressing, except in the most reserved manner, the love she really entertains for Count Asdrubal. After his apparent ruin, however, the advances are all from her side; and she finds herself obliged to resort to all kinds of devices in order to compel him to a formal declaration. She even feels called upon to appear--though whether for logical or merely for picturesque reasons can scarcely at this distant date be decided--in a Hussar uniform; and in this striking garb Madame Marcolini sang the celebrated final rondo, saluting the public with her sabre in acknowledgment of their applause, and repeating the salutes again and again as the applause was renewed.
_La Pietra del Paragone_ is quite unknown to the opera-goers of the present day. It belongs to the year 1812, and probably no one now living ever heard it. Many, however, have heard portions of it; for _La Pietra del Paragone_ not having proved thoroughly successful as a whole, the composer extracted the best pieces from it and introduced them into _La Cenerentola_, which, five years later, was represented for the first time at Rome. The air "Miei rampolli," the duet "Un soave no so chè," the drinking chorus, and the baron's burlesque proclamation, were all borrowed or rather taken once and for ever from the score of _La Pietra del Paragone_. Some other pieces, too, from the same work were nearly fifty years later heard at least once in an opera attributed to Rossini brought out at Paris in the year 1859. It has been said that among Rossini's operas of the year 1812 were two written for the San Mosè of Venice. The second of these, _L'Occasione fa il Ladro_, made its appearance substantially at Naples in conjunction with the pieces just spoken of, extracted from _La Pietra del Paragone_. An Italian poetaster, Signor Berettoni, gave to his new arrangement of _L'Occasione fa il Ladro_ (which, by the way, he had enriched with selections not only from _La Pietra del Paragone_, but also from _Aureliano in Palmira_) the title of _Un Curioso Accidente_.
Rossini, however, though he did not mind borrowing from himself, did not choose to be borrowed from without permission, as without dexterity, by other persons; and finding that a _pasticcio_ made up of pieces taken more or less at random from the works of his youth was to be brought out as a new and original work, he addressed to the manager of the Théâtre des Italiens, M. Calzado, the following letter on the subject:--
"_November 11th, 1859._.
"SIR,--I am told that the bills of your theatre announce a new opera by me under this title _Un Curioso Accidente_.
Edwards structures his biography around a series of sharp contrasts: Rossini's early Italian triumphs versus his later Parisian career, the prolific output of his youth against the long silence after Guillaume Tell. The narrative moves through distinct phases, each marked by a change of scene—from Bologna to Naples, then to Paris and finally back to Italy. A recurring image is that of Rossini at the piano, where his 'lightning-like execution' and 'vertiginous hands' seem to transform the instrument into an orchestra. One anecdote, relayed by Auber, describes the keys appearing to smoke after Rossini played—a striking metaphor for the intensity of his performance.
A Career in Two Acts
The biography divides Rossini's life into two unequal halves: the first, a rapid succession of operas composed between 1810 and 1829; the second, nearly four decades of near-silence after Guillaume Tell. Edwards traces this arc through specific locations—the Teatro San Carlo in Naples, the Théâtre des Italiens in Paris—and through the composer's own explanations. Rossini himself, in a passage quoted by Edwards, cites the July Revolution, his mother's death, and his father's discomfort in France as reasons for abandoning the stage. Yet the narrative also hints at a deeper artistic exhaustion: the strain of producing Guillaume Tell may have been one he did not wish to repeat. Edwards does not resolve the question definitively, but the structure of the book itself—moving from a dense catalog of works to a sparse aftermath—mirrors this abrupt shift.
The Piano as Orchestra
Edwards repeatedly returns to Rossini's pianism as a window into his musical mind. The most vivid description comes from Auber, who recalls Rossini singing Figaro's cavatina 'Largo al fattotum' with a 'beautiful baritone voice' and accompanying himself with such speed that the keys seemed to smoke. Edwards contrasts this with the performances of professional singers like Pellegrini, Galli, and Lablache, whom Rossini surpassed in spirit and verve. The image of hands galloping 'not on a key-board but on an orchestra' collapses the distinction between piano and ensemble, suggesting that Rossini's compositional genius was inseparable from his physical command of the instrument. This anecdote, placed early in the narrative, sets a standard of virtuosity against which later descriptions of his operatic works are measured.
Paris and the Politics of Patronage
Rossini's move to Paris in the 1820s marks a shift in the biography's focus from creative output to institutional maneuvering. Edwards details the composer's appointment as director of the Théâtre des Italiens with a salary of 20,000 francs, and his subsequent resignation after eighteen months—only to receive a continued stipend as 'Inspector of Singing,' a post with 'purely nominal' duties. The French government's aim was to keep Rossini in the country and secure new works for the Académie. This arrangement produced four major operas, including Le Siège de Corinthe and Moïse, both reworkings of earlier Italian scores. Edwards presents these adaptations not as mere translations but as strategic responses to French taste, a process that culminates in the original Guillaume Tell. The narrative here becomes as much about cultural diplomacy as about music.
The Unwritten Faust
Among the most intriguing passages in Edwards's account is Rossini's abandoned plan for an opera on Goethe's Faust. The composer, in conversation with Ferdinand Hiller, describes having 'planned the whole scenarium' with the librettist Jouy, only to be deterred by a 'regular Faust mania' that swept Parisian theatres. This episode, placed just before the account of his retirement, functions as a turning point: the project that might have extended his career instead becomes a symbol of withdrawal. Edwards does not speculate on what the opera might have sounded like, but the mere fact that Rossini considered it—and that he cited external fashion as a reason for abandoning it—adds a layer of contingency to the narrative. The Faust plan remains a ghost in the biography, a reminder of paths not taken.
The Stabat Mater and the Final Silence
After Guillaume Tell, Edwards notes, Rossini composed 'nothing whatever of importance except his thoroughly beautiful Stabat Mater.' This sacred work, produced decades later, stands as an isolated monument in the composer's late years. The biography treats it as a coda, a single major piece that does not reverse the pattern of silence. Edwards refrains from claiming that the Stabat Mater represents a late stylistic shift or a return to form; instead, he presents it as an exception that proves the rule. The narrative ends not with a triumphant finale but with a quiet dissolution, as Rossini returns to Italy to care for his aging father. The structure of the book—accelerating through the early operas, then slowing to a near-halt—enacts the very trajectory it describes.
Readers approaching this biography should attend to the way Edwards uses anecdote and scene to build his portrait. The smoking piano keys, the abandoned Faust, the nominal inspectorship—these details are not decorative but structural, each one marking a pivot in Rossini's career. The book rewards those who read for movement: between countries, between genres, between sound and silence. Edwards's Rossini is a composer defined as much by what he stopped doing as by what he achieved.
Reading about Rossini’s retreat after Guillaume Tell, I thought of how some stories just end quietly, leaving you staring at the silence. The way his keys nearly smoked under his fingers—that intensity abandoned—reminds me of the old operatic world captured in Amadis of Gaul, an opera As it is perform'd at the King's Theatre in the Hay-market — Background and Themes. It lingers like a half-remembered tune, warm and slightly sad.
Scarlett Martin
3 weeks agoEvelyn Torres
1 month agoWilliam Wright
2 weeks agoLiam Taylor
4 weeks ago-
Steven Miller - 2 weeks ago
This book offers a wonderful overview of Rossini's influence and the musical landscape of his era. The author's passion for the subject shines through, making complex musical history engaging and accessible. A must-read for opera lovers and students of nineteenth-century music. -
David Roy Jones - 1 week ago
Unfortunately, this work feels superficial and dated. It devotes too much space to anecdotes and not enough to substantive musical analysis or historical context. The prose is flowery and sentimental, hindering an objective understanding of Rossini. There are better modern studies available. -
Victor Daniels - 1 week ago
A solid introduction to Rossini and his pedagogical legacy, though the focus on the 'school' sometimes overshadows Rossini himself. The writing is clear and informative, but the book lacks depth in musical analysis. Decent for beginners, less satisfying for experts.
Record your reading impressions
A brief reflection can help important ideas stay with you longer.
Grayson Anderson
4 weeks ago