The Life & Letters of Peter Ilich Tchaikovsky — Story, Setting & Ideas
Edition facts
Before opening The Life & Letters of Peter Ilich Tchaikovsky — Story, Setting & Ideas, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 262,454 words, 19 hr 2 min estimated reading time, and 39 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 16.9 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Composers -- Russia -- Biography,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
ile he cared nothing for questions of pedigree, he rejoiced to discover among his earliest ancestors on his father’s side one orthodox Russian from the district of Kremenschug.
Tracing back Tchaikovsky’s pedigree, we do not find a single name connected with music. There is not one instance of a professional musician, and only three can be considered amateurs--his mother’s brother, Michael Assier; her sister Catharine, in her day a well-known amateur in Petersburg society; and the composer’s mother herself, who sang the fashionable ballads of her youth with feeling and expression. All the rest of the family--Assiers and Tchaikovskys alike--not only lacked musical talent, but were indifferent to the art. Thus it is almost impossible to ascertain from whom Peter Ilich inherited his genius, if indeed there can be any question of heredity. His one certain inheritance seems to have been an abnormally neurotic tendency, which probably came to him through his grandfather Assier, who suffered from epilepsy. If it is true, as a modern scientist asserts, that “genius” is merely an abnormal physical condition, then it is possible that Tchaikovsky may have inherited his musical gift, at the same time as his “nerves,” from the Assier family.
Little is known of the early life of the composer’s father, Ilia Petrovich Tchaikovsky. In old age he rarely spoke of his youth, and did not care to be questioned about it. Not that he had any painful memories to conceal, but it was his habit to avoid all reference to himself, and only to speak of his past when he had some amusing anecdote to relate, or when he was induced by others to recall some glad, or sorrowful, event of bygone days.
Ilia Petrovich Tchaikovsky was educated at the School of Mining Engineers, which he left in 1817 at the age of twenty-two, having been awarded the distinction of a silver medal. In the same year he was appointed to an inspectorship in the Mining and Geological Department. His career cannot have been brilliant, since it took him twenty years to rise to the rank corresponding to a lieutenant-colonel. But the fact that at thirty he was already a member of the Scientific Committee of the Institute of Mining Engineers, and lectured on mining law and statistics, proves him to have been a capable and industrious member of his profession.
In private life, all who knew him agreed as to his sympathetic, jovial, and straightforward character. Benevolence--or more correctly speaking, a universal affection--was one of his chief characteristics. In youth, manhood, and old age he loved his neighbour, and his faith in him remained unshaken. His trustfulness knew no limits; and even the loss of his entire fortune, due to misplaced confidence, did not avail to make him suspicious of his fellow-men. To the end of his days, everyone he met was “an excellent, honourable, good fellow.” Disillusionment cut him to the quick, but had no power to obscure his rosy views of human nature. It would be difficult to find a man who possessed so many devoted friends.
Although a capable specialist, as regards general culture and intelligence Ilia Petrovich had only a mediocre equipment. He had no great taste for art and science. Music and the drama interested him most. In his youth he played the flute a little, but gave it up early in life.
On September 11th (23rd), 1827, Ilia Petrovich married Maria Carlovna Keiser, by whom he had one daughter. Shortly afterwards he was left a widower and, in October, 1833, married, for a second time, Alexandra Andreievna Assier.
Almost as little is known of the childhood and youth of the composer’s mother as of his father. As early as 1816 she was left motherless, and was brought up in a Female Orphanage, where she completed her education in 1829. The instruction in this school appears to have been excellent. Alexandra Andreievna had a thorough knowledge of French and German. In addition, she played the piano a little and sang nicely. A satisfactory education for a girl who had neither means nor position.
Those who knew the composer’s mother describe her as tall and distinguished-looking; not precisely handsome, but with wonderfully expressive eyes. All agreed that there was something particularly attractive in her appearance. Peter Ilich recollected his mother as a tall woman, inclined to be stout, with wonderful eyes and beautiful hands, although by no means small. “Such hands do not exist nowadays, and never will again,” he used to say in after life.
Alexandra Andreievna, unlike her husband, was rather reserved and chary of endearments. Her kindness, as compared to his universal amiability, seemed somewhat austere, and showed itself more frequently in act than in speech. The first child of this marriage was a daughter who died in infancy.
Modeste Tchaikovsky's authorized biography of his brother, translated by Rosa Newmarch, is structured as a hybrid of memoir and epistolary record. The narrative voice shifts between the biographer's third-person commentary and the composer's own letters, creating a layered portrait of Tchaikovsky's inner life. The excerpts show how the book moves from broad biographical framing—such as the translator's justification of abridgments—to intimate, first-person accounts of rehearsals, travel, and emotional states. This alternation of perspectives gives the reader direct access to Tchaikovsky's voice while maintaining editorial distance.
The Biographer's Dual Role
Modeste Tchaikovsky occupies a unique position as both sibling and chronicler. The text reveals his presence primarily through the selection and arrangement of letters, yet his own voice emerges in transitional passages that contextualize events. For instance, after quoting a letter about the Maid of Orleans rehearsals, Modeste adds: “The production … left a very unpleasant memory in Tchaikovsky’s mind.” This editorial gloss does not merely summarize; it interprets the emotional residue of the experience. The biographer also notes his brother's sensitivity to criticism, observing that “his artistic vanity was exceedingly sensitive, even when his best friends told him ‘the plain truth.’” Such remarks blend affection with frankness, a tone that distinguishes this work from a purely documentary collection.
Letters as Windows to Mood and Setting
Tchaikovsky's letters are rich with sensory detail and abrupt shifts in mood. Writing from Florence in 1881, he exclaims: “What light! What sunshine! … I feel so well, and yet so sad—I could weep.” The juxtaposition of delight and melancholy is characteristic. His correspondence also records practical frustrations: the difficulty of finding a dress-coat on a Sunday in Rome, or the intrigues of opera officials. These details ground the emotional highs and lows in concrete circumstances. The letters are not merely artistic statements; they are dispatches from a life constantly in motion—between St. Petersburg, Italy, and the composer's own fluctuating spirits.
Critical Reception and Its Aftermath
The excerpts show how the biography handles public failure. After the premiere of The Maid of Orleans, Tchaikovsky reports being “recalled twenty-four times.” Yet a telegram soon informs him that the press deems the opera “poor in inspiration, wearisome, and monotonous.” The narrative does not linger on this contradiction; instead, it moves quickly to the next letter, from Rome. The effect is to let the composer's resilience—or perhaps his avoidance—speak for itself. The biographer notes that Cui “led the chorus of unfavourable opinion,” but offers no rebuttal. This restraint leaves the reader to weigh the public verdict against the private triumph of the premiere.
Readers approaching this biography should attend to the interplay between Modeste's framing and the raw letters. The book's pace quickens during travel sequences and slows for artistic setbacks, mirroring Tchaikovsky's own rhythms. Because the excerpts cover only portions of the composer's life, the full arc of his career must be inferred from the selected correspondence. The index of works and names at the end provides a useful reference for tracking recurring figures and compositions across the seven parts.
There are moments in Modeste's pages—reading Tchaikovsky's own hand about a theme that won't settle—that feel less like biography and more like sitting beside someone working it out. It stays with you. I found that same quiet absorption in Wagner : The Story of the Boy Who Wrote Little Plays — Key Ideas to Explore, where the struggle begins earlier, in a boy's first attempts, and somehow that made the older composer's letters feel even nearer.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
What did you think of this book?
Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.